Not in Turkey’s interests
to attack Kurdistan
This is what Saywan Barzani, Iraqi Kurdistan’s
representative in Europe, said in an interview with
AsiaNews. In his opinion a “large scale” Turkish
intervention against the PKK the Turkish government
and army aim at revamping their own fortunes on a
theme that can unify the country, the never-ending
Kurdish Question.

Paris (AsiaNews) – It is not in the interests of
Turkey to invade Kurdistan because it would destroy the
economy and destabilising the entire region. An attack
by Turkey’s army has no or limited chances of success
given the terrain. PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party)
fighters are present throughout the region and can
easily slip into Iran or Turkey itself.
This is what Saywan Barzani, nephew of Iraqi
Kurdistan’s President Massoud Barzani and its
representative in Europe, told AsiaNews in an
interview. For him the PKK is an internal Turkish
problem due to contrasts between the secular army and
the Islamist government and caused by the fact that
Ankara has deprived its own Kurds of any breathing
space, denied their very existence and pursued policies
of under-developing its Kurdish region.
How do you explain the
recent escalation in tensions between Turkey and Iraq?
The ongoing Turkish escalation is due to an internal
conflict between Turkey’s powerful army and its elected
Islamist government. Both camps, the secular and
Islamist, are trying to revamp their fortunes on a
unifying issue, that of the Kurdish Question.
Rising violence in Turkey’s neighbours represents a
defeat for Ankara’s policies. Ever since modern Turkey
was founded it has faced revolts by Kurds demanding a
minimum number of cultural, political and economic
rights.
The government of Iraqi Kurdistan is not to blame if
there is extreme poverty in the Kurdish areas of Turkey,
if their existence is even denied. Kurdish rebels are
fighting a civil war that is largely affecting civilians
and the obvious underdevelopment of Turkey’s Kurdish
areas even when compared to the rest of the country.
About four thousand villages have been evacuated and
destroyed. The eastern region of Turkey has become
lawless, an area for all sorts of traffic, starting with
billions of dollars in drugs as well as weapons and
alcohol smuggling.
What is the
relationship between Ankara and Iraqi Kurdistan?
The creation of the government Iraqi Kurdistan in
1992 was a chance for Turkey. Initially violence dropped
by 80 per cent. More than 32,000 trucks were moving
goods destined for Iraqi Kurdistan. The whole of
south-eastern Turkey survives essentially thanks to
official trade with our region. Last year Turkey’s
exports in our region were more than US$ 5 billion with
some 700 Turkish companies operating there.
We too want the PKK to stop its armed struggle, not
because we believe it gained any rights for the Kurdish
people, but rather because in Turkey it can use
democratic institutions to peacefully realise structural
reforms.
Is the Turkish threat
of “large scale” intervention in Iraqi territory
realistic?
Escalation and military threats from another age have
no basis today and cannot be of any interest to Turkey
except to carry on its 20th century nationalism, the
official doctrine of its state and army.
First of all, the stated goal of eradicating the PKK
cannot be achieved. In the last few years the Turkish
army carried out 25 incursions into Iraq without any
tangible result. Turkish Kurdish fighters are more than
130 kilometres from the border at 3,400 metres. It would
take a Turkish tank 15 days to get there whereas in a
two-hour march the guerrillas can be Iran.
Even if Turkey killed a few thousand fighters, others
would take their place. There are thousands of PKK men
in Iran, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia.
The [Kurdish] Question needs a political solution,
not threats of extermination that have failed to achieve
anything so far. Whatever military incursion Turkey can
mount will just ruin the Turkish and Iraqi economies and
destabilise the wider region.
How can the
international community help solve the crisis?
The only solution is though negotiations and non
interference in one’s internal affairs. For example,
Iraq’s neighbours ought not to interfere in how
Kurdistan’s borders are decided in the Kirkuk
referendum.
Moreover, as the protector of Iraq’s borders the
United States must clearly tell the Turks what their
position is and reject whatever baseless arguments the
latter can muster. The Americans must impose peace and
call on the PKK and the Ankara government to stay away
from Iraqi Kurdistan which is just emerging from 40
years of war and genocide.
Western public opinion and governments are the only
ones who can get the Turks to pursue a peaceful policy,
stop threatening Iraqi Kurdistan’s nascent democracy,
and find a solution to their own 80-year-old Kurdish
problem.