COMMENTARY ON BISHOP
EUGIN MANNA'S PREFACE
PART II
by Henry
Bedros Kipha
(Paris/France)
THE ARAMEANS ARE
CALLED SYRIACS
In part 1 of my
study on Bishop
Manna's Preface
which was publiched
in the Journal ARAM
(Number 2 of the
journal), the
attention was drawn
to the fact that
both East and West
Syriacs seem to
accept without
further examination
what Bishop Manna
wrote on the term
Syriac.
It is a pity that
the majority of the
Syriac people has
accepted his
opinions without any
examination.
Talking to people
interested in Syriac
history I have in
vain tried to
account for the many
mistakes concerning
the term Syriac.
I recommend the
readers to read
Manna's Preface once
more and to study
the many proofs I
shall put forward in
this article so that
you can draw your
own conclusions
concerning Manna's
inferences,
especially the
conclusion that
during the first
centuries of the
Christian era the
term Syriac came to
be synonymous with
Christian.
As the article is
long, it is
necessary to divide
it into four parts.
I shall first treat
the historic
mistakes made by
Bishop Manna and
then I put forward a
new observation
which helps us to
understand what
caused Bishop Manna
to make the mistakes
he made, and which
enables us to see
"why" and "when"
Syriac became
synonymous with
Christian.
Part I) What Bishop
Manna wrote about
the term.
Part II) The
mistakes and
contradictions.
Part III) About the
origin of
Syria from
Surus.
Part IV) What the
Orientalist
Quatremere wrote
about the term
Syria and its
origin from Assyria.
PART I - What
Bishop Manna wrote
about the term
Bishop Manna wrote
as follows in his
Preface:
"The scholars have
differed widely in
their opinions
regarding the
pronunciation of
Syria which
gave the Syriac
people its name.
Some of them,
especially the
Europeans considered
that the
pronunciation is
derived from Athour
or Ashour. According
to them, it appeared
after the Assyrian
kings had conquered
Syria (the
land of Ararn).
In his book on the
history of the
semitic languages,
famous French
Orientalist Renan
wrote: "Finally,
during the time of
the Seleucids, the
name Aram was
replaced by
Syria which
is nothing else than
an abbreviation of
Assyria (I mean
Athour or Athorya
according to its
Greek
pronunciation). This
name was used
commonly by the
Greeks and
designated the whole
of Inner Asia.
Despite of this, the
name Aram has not
ceased totally to be
used but has
remained in use,
especially with the
Aramaeans who did
not become
Christians as the
Nabataeans and the
Haranaeans. This
explains why
Aramaean is commonly
identified with the
Sabaean and the
heathens."
The bishop renders
still more opinions
concerning the name
" Syria",
putting his trust in
both East and West
Syriac writers. But
the opinions of
these writers are of
little scientific
value as their
judgments lack
foundation in
documents. To these
writers belong:
1. Bar Ali who is
the author of a
famous Syriac
dictionary. His
opinion was that
Syria
comprised the whole
territory from
Antioch to Edessa.
It was called
Syria after
Surus who killed his
own brother to rule
over Mesopotamia all
by himself.
2. In his dictionary
Hasan Bar Bahloul
died ca 962, wrote
that "the word
Syria is
derived from Surus,
irrespective of he
was alive or dead.
Surus killed his
brother and ruled
over Mesopotamia.
After his name the
whole of his country
was called Suriya
(=Syria). The
Syriacs were by the
way earlier called
Aramaeans".
3. Bar Salibi †1171,
in his book "oru,utho".
In Chapter 14 of
this book, he
attacked the Greeks.
He wrote: "But they
(the Greeks) call us
Jacobites instead of
Syriacs in order to
make fun of us. Our
answer is that the
Syriac name that you
deprive us of is no
name of honour to
us, as it is derived
from the name Surus,
which was the name
of a king who ruled
over Antioch and
gave it the name
Syria. While
we are the sons of
Aram, and were once
called Aramaeans".
The bishop concludes
his presentation:
"Irrespective of the
degree of truth of
the above-mentioned
opinions, there are
undoubted
consequences
1. Formerly, the
Syriacs in general,
East as well as West
Syriacs, were not
called Syriacs but
Aramaeans - after
their ancestor Aram
who was the son of
Sem who was the son
of Noah.
2. The origin of the
term Syriacs
(Syrians) dates from
the fifth or sixth
centuries BC.at the
most.
3. The Aramaeans did
not adopt the term
Syriacs (Syrians)
until after Christ.
They adopted it from
the apostles who
spread the Gospel
among the Aramaeans,
and as all the
apostles came from
Syrian Palestine our
ancestors who were
christians wanted to
confess their
adherence to the
name their preachers
bore in order to
distinguish
themselves in this
way from the
Aramaeans who were
still heathens.
Therefore, the
pronunciation
aramaya or oromoyo
became synonymous
with the Sabaean and
the heathens and the
pronunciation Syriac
(Syrian) synonymous
with Christian up to
our time."
If the reader
scrutinizes Bishop
Manna's book, he
will find that the
bishop has made no
distinct decision on
the name Syriac. He
does not give a
clear cut answer to
the question if the
word
Syria is
derived from Assyria
according to the
historian Renan or
from the name of the
Aramaean King Surus
according to the
Syriac writers.
This is undoubtedly
a difficult
question.
Still today, the
Syriacs do not agree
among themselves
concerning the
origin of the term.
Today, it would be
possible to solve
this problem,
namely, if we relied
on what has been
written since the
year 1900,
especially in regard
to the old
historical sources.
The bishop's attempt
to find out the
origin of the term "Syriac
(Syrian)" has given
us a "new problem",
namely, his binding
together to each
other the name "Syriac
(Syrians)" and the
conversion of the
East Aramaeans to
Christianity. This
was what made him
and the majority of
the Syriacs believe
in following
equation: "Syriac
(Syrian) is
synonymous with
Christian".
Sources:
1.Dictionary of
Chaldean-Arabic,
Preface,p.15. 2.Mingana (A), ed.,
Bar Salibi in
"Woodbroke
Studies".V.1(1927),p.72.
v 3. Corpus
Scriptorum
Christianorum
Orientalum,
C.S.C.O., T. 6,
p.360. 4. Quatre Mere,
Memoire Sur les
Nabateems, 1831,
p.24. 5. Ibid., p.24.
6. Strabo,
Geographie I (2). 74
Aram 3-4 1992
|